
Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from it” –Proverbs 22:6
The Puritans remind us of the value and importance of family ministry. Family worship was one of the hallmarks of the Puritan era and one of their greatest legacies. The Puritan pastor Richard Baxter knew the importance of family ministry:
The Puritans believed that their home was their church and the primary place of learning the Bible and moral instruction. They knew the call to “make disciples” begins in the home. Discipleship begins in our marriages, by loving our spouses with the love of Christ and by teaching, loving, and disciplining our children. The Puritans believed that it was a parent’s spiritual responsibility to disciple and teach their children about the faith.
“Family worship was one of the hallmarks of the Puritan era
”
As Christian parents, we should also want to raise our children to grow up to love Jesus and know the Bible. It is important for children to begin learning about God and the Bible at home. If every family in every church got serious about making disciples in the home, it would change our nation and our world.
How are you creating good discipleship in your home?
God knows, we have all been guilty of this; we may still be guilty.
Why do we come to God’s house? What really is the character of our worship when we come to analyze it? Is it not true that in exactly the same way as God’s people of old, we feel that we gain merit by doing it?
Probably thousands of people still go to church on Sunday morning, and then they are finished; and they have done it, as it were, so they can go and do anything else they like now—write family letters, play games, read the Sunday newspapers, look at the television, watch some exciting thing here or there. They have been to church on Sunday morning, and that is all.
That was exactly the position of these children of Israel. It was formal, it was mechanical… .
Let me repeat: Ten times worse than being outside and saying, ‘There is no God at all’ is going to God and to His house in a formal manner only.
Martyn Lloyd-Jones [Psalm 50]
Robbie Low, writing in Touchstone (June 2003), points to an interesting 1994 study in Switzerland about the connection between the churchgoing habits of fathers and mothers and the effect on their children when they are grown.

Here’s a summary:
In short, if a father does not go to church, no matter how faithful his wife’s devotions, only one child in 50 will become a regular worshipper. If a father does go regularly, regardless of the practice of the mother, between two-thirds and three-quarters of their children will become churchgoers (regular and irregular). If a father goes but irregularly to church, regardless of his wife’s devotion, between a half and two-thirds of their offspring will find themselves coming to church regularly or occasionally.
A non-practicing mother with a regular father will see a minimum of two-thirds of her children ending up at church. In contrast, a non-practicing father with a regular mother will see two-thirds of his children never darken the church door. If his wife is similarly negligent that figure rises to 80 percent!
The results are shocking, but they should not be surprising. They are about as politically incorrect as it is possible to be; but they simply confirm what psychologists, criminologists, educationalists, and traditional Christians know. You cannot buck the biology of the created order. Father’s influence, from the determination of a child’s sex by the implantation of his seed to the funerary rites surrounding his passing, is out of all proportion to his allotted, and severely diminished role, in Western liberal society.
A mother’s role will always remain primary in terms of intimacy, care, and nurture. (The toughest man may well sport a tattoo dedicated to the love of his mother, without the slightest embarrassment or sentimentality). No father can replace that relationship. But it is equally true that when a child begins to move into that period of differentiation from home and engagement with the world “out there,” he (and she) looks increasingly to the father for his role model. Where the father is indifferent, inadequate, or just plain absent, that task of differentiation and engagement is much harder. When children see that church is a “women and children” thing, they will respond accordingly—by not going to church, or going much less.
Curiously, both adult women as well as men will conclude subconsciously that Dad’s absence indicates that going to church is not really a “grown-up” activity. In terms of commitment, a mother’s role may be to encourage and confirm, but it is not primary to her adult offspring’s decision. Mothers’ choices have dramatically less effect upon children than their fathers’, and without him she has little effect on the primary lifestyle choices her offspring make in their religious observances.
Her major influence is not on regular attendance at all but on keeping her irregular children from lapsing altogether. This is, needless to say, a vital work, but even then, without the input of the father (regular or irregular), the proportion of regulars to lapsed goes from 60/40 to 40/60.

“Why are we so precise as to our food, our clothes, our money-matters, and why does this accuracy displease us in divine literature alone? He crawls along the ground, they say, he wearies himself out with words and syllables! Why do we slight any word of Him whom we venerate and worship under the name of ‘the Word’?”
Erasmus, quoted in David Daiches, The King James Version of the English Bible (Chicago, 1941), page 141.
The Bible deserves our most careful attention. Why? Because it is the scepter of the King, the practical mechanism by which he makes his rule a felt reality among us. If we love our Lord, we will pore over his Word with reverent care, especially when everything is on the line.
Do our churches always demonstrate that practical submission to him? If the Bible is not what makes the difference in the tone, the decisions, the direction of a church, that church is functionally liberal. Its official position might be evangelical. But its practical functionality is liberal.
Many liberal churches like the Bible. They study the Bible. They preach from the Bible. They derive comfort from the Bible. But something other than the Bible exercises the primary influence. It’s what liberal churches do.
In his “Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God,” Jonathan Edwards lists as an unmistakable indicator that the Holy Spirit is at work “… a greater regard to the Holy Scriptures.” “The devil never would attempt to beget in persons a regard to that divine word which God has given to be the great and standing rule for the direction of his church in all religious matters and all concerns of their souls in all ages… . He is engaged against the Bible and hates every word in it.”
When we put the Bible back into the functional, determinative center of our churches, so that we humble ourselves and follow the Word of the Lord carefully, we can be sure the Holy Spirit is wonderfully at work. It’s what evangelical churches do.
Register for the conference online or call 1.888.346.4700
Register now for the 2011 Desiring God Conference for Pastors.